KEBIJAKAN RAMAH KELUARGA PADA NEGARA RAMAH KELUARGA VERSI UNICEF: SEBUAH KAJIAN CAKUPAN

Naomi Vembriati; Ni Made S. Wulanyani

doi:10.35760/psi.2025.v18i1.384

Authors

Naomi Vembriati Udayana University Author
Ni Made S. Wulanyani Udayana University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35760/psi.2025.v18i1.384

Keywords:

Kajian cakupan, Kebijakan ramah keluarga, Keseimbangan kerja-keluarga, UNICEF

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan memetakan implementasi kebijakan ramah keluarga (family-friendly policies/FFP) pada negara-negara yang dipandang paling ramah keluarga menurut UNICEF (2019), yaitu Swedia, Norwegia, dan Islandia. Metode yang digunakan adalah scoping review dengan panduan PRISMA-ScR dan kerangka CHIP untuk merumuskan pertanyaan kajian, strategi pencarian, serta kriteria inklusi-eksklusi. Pencarian literatur dilakukan pada basis data Science Direct, EBSCOhost, dan Emerald dengan rentang publikasi 2011–2021. Dari 895 artikel yang teridentifikasi, 24 artikel memenuhi kriteria akhir dan dianalisis dengan pendekatan analisis tematik. Hasil menunjukkan tiga kategori utama kebijakan ramah keluarga: (1) pengaturan kerja fleksibel (flexitime, kerja paruh waktu, pengurangan jam kerja), (2) cuti orang tua berbayar, termasuk cuti ayah yang tidak dapat dipindahtangankan, dan (3) kebijakan perawatan anak melalui layanan penitipan bersubsidi maupun tunjangan finansial. Implementasi kebijakan di negara Nordik dipengaruhi oleh Model Nordik yang menekankan kesetaraan, solidaritas, dan universalisme. Pemanfaatan kebijakan tinggi, khususnya cuti ayah dan layanan perawatan anak, yang berdampak pada peningkatan partisipasi kerja perempuan, keterlibatan ayah dalam pengasuhan, serta kesejahteraan keluarga. Dibandingkan dengan Indonesia, dukungan negara Nordik jauh lebih komprehensif, namun arah kebijakan di Indonesia menunjukkan perkembangan positif melalui regulasi baru dan inisiatif perusahaan.

References

*Agosti, M. T., Andersson, I., Ejlertsson, G., & Janlöv, A.-C. (2015). Shift work to balance everyday life - A salutogenic nursing perspective in home help service in Sweden. BMC Nursing, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-014-0054-6

Annava, V. A., Yulianto, B. A., Suwarno, P., Widodo, P., Juni, H., & Saragih, R. (2022). Empat Pilar Kebangsaan Sebagai Dasar Perumusan Naskah Politik dan Strategi Nasional. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 2555–2562.

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

*Arnalds, Á. A., Björk Eydal, G., & Dís Skaptadóttir, U. (2022). Construction of Childcare Practices Among Icelandic and Polish Parents Living in Iceland: Mixed-Methods Explorations. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 52(4), 623–647. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.52.4.05

*Beham, B., Drobnič, S., & Präg, P. (2014). The Work-Family Interface of Service Sector Workers: A Comparison of Work Resources and Professional Status across Five European Countries. Applied Psychology, 63(1), 29–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12012

Bethel, A. C., Rogers, M., & Abbott, R. (2021). Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review search methods, results, and efficiency. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.809

Bezzina, F., Azzopardi, R. M., & Vella, G. (2013). Understanding and Assessing the Work Motivations of Employed Women : Insights Into Increasing Female Participation Rates in the Maltese Labor Market. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013502987

*Børve, H. E., & Bungum, B. (2015). Norwegian Working Fathers in Global Working Life. Gender, Work and Organization, 22(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/GWAO.12086

Boushey, H. (2008). Family Friendly Policies: Helping Mothers Make Ends Meet. Review of Social Economy, 66(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760701668446

*Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2019). Workplace support of fathers’ parental leave use in Norway. Community, Work & Family, 22(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1472067

Chzhen, Y., Gromada, A., & Rees, G. (2019). Are The World’s Richest Countries Family-Friendly? Policy in the OECD and EU. UNICEF Office of Research, 6, 1–22. www.unicef-irc.org

Couban, R. (2016). Covidence and Rayyan. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l’Association Des Bibliothèques de La Santé Du Canada, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-025

Daftar Perusahaan yang Memberikan Cuti Orang Tua Berbayar. (2021). DW.Com. https://www.dw.com/id/daftar-perusahaan-yang-memberikan-cuti-orang-tua-berbayar/a-57047413

Danone. (2022). Terapkan Kebijakan Ramah Keluarga: Inilah Berbagai Program dari Danone Indonesia. Danone.Co.Id. https://danone.co.id/tak-berkategori-id/terapkan-kebijakan-ramah-keluarga-inilah-berbagai-program-dari-danone-indonesia/

Danone S.A. (2017). Danone Global Parental Policy (pp. 1–10). Danone S.A. https://www.danone.com/content/dam/danone-corp/danone-com/about-us-impact/policies-and-commitments/en/2017/2017_06_23_DanoneGlobalParentalPolicy.pdf

Deepta Chopra, & Krishnan, M. (2019). Linking Family-Friendly Policies to Women’s Economic Empowerment: An evidence brief. https://www.unicef.org/sites/default/files/2019-07/UNICEF-Gender-Family-Friendly-Policies-2019.pdf

Ewald, H., Klerings, I., Wagner, G., Heise, T. L., Stratil, J. M., Lhachimi, S. K., Hemkens, L. G., Gartlehner, G., Armijo-Olivo, S., & Nussbaumer-Streit, B. (2022). Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 149, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.022

Eydal, G., & Ólafsson, S. (2008). Family Policy in Iceland: An Overview. In I. Ostner & C. Schmitt (Eds.), Family Policies in the Context of Family Change (pp. 109–127). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90895-3_6

Giannikis, S. K., & Mihail, D. M. (2010). Motivation of working women in the Greek retail sector: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Manpower, 31(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721011031667

*Giuliani, G., & Duvander, A. Z. (2017). Cash‐for‐care policy in Sweden: An appraisal of its consequences on female employment. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12229

*Grönlund, A., & Öun, I. (2018). Beyond the Mummy Track? Part-time Rights, Gender, and Career-Family Dilemmas. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 8(3), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v8i3.109546

Gröpel, P., & Kuhl, J. (2009). Work-life balance and subjective well-being: The mediating role of need fulfilment. British Journal of Psychology, 100(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X337797

*Haas, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2013). Trade union support for fathers’ use of work-family benefits - lessons from Sweden. Community, Work and Family, 16(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2012.724272

*Haas, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2019). Workplace support and European fathers’ use of state policies promoting shared childcare. Community, Work and Family, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1556204

Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230

Havnes, T., & Mogstad, M. (2011). Money for nothing? Universal child care and maternal employment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(11–12), 1455–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.016

Heymann, J., Richter, L., Britto, P., Raghavan, C., Wong, E., Griswold, M., Palmquist, A., -, C. E. R. W. G. of the G. B., Begin, F., Arts, M., Taqi, I., Earle, A., Heymann, J., Chopra, D., Krishnan, M., Jha, S., Rumble, L., Samman, E., Lombardi, J., … Orton, I. (2019). Family-Friendly Policies: Redesigning the Workplace of the Future. https://www.unicef.org/early-childhood-development/family-friendly-policies

Heymann, J., Sprague, A. R., Nandi, A., Earle, A., Batra, P., Schickedanz, A., Chung, P. J., & Raub, A. (2017). Paid parental leave and family wellbeing in the sustainable development era. Public Health Reviews, 38(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0067-2

*Ingólfsdóttir, E. S., & Gíslason, I. V. (2016). Gendered Solutions to the Care Gap Issue in Iceland. NORA: Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(4), 220–233. http://10.0.4.56/08038740.2016.1241826

*Javornik, J., & Kurowska, A. (2017). Work and Care Opportunities under Different Parental Leave Systems: Gender and Class Inequalities in Northern Europe. Social Policy and Administration, 51(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/SPOL.12316

*Joecks, J. (2021). The provision of work–life balance practices across welfare states and industries and their impact on extraordinary turnover. Social Policy & Administration, 55(7), 1325–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12728

*Joecks, J., Kurowska, A., & Pull, K. (2021). Is the push by female employees for family-friendly practices context-dependent? Comparative evidence from Sweden, Poland and Germany. Journal of Business Research, 126, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.061

*Jou, J., Wong, E., Franken, D., Raub, A., & Heymann, J. (2020). Paid parental leave policies for single-parent households: an examination of legislative approaches in 34 OECD countries. Community, Work and Family, 23(2), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1517083

Kautto, M., & Kuitto, K. (2021). The Nordic Countries. In D. Béland, S. Leibfried, K. J. Morgan, H. Obinger, & C. Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State (2nd editio, pp. 803–825). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198828389.013.46

*Kotsadam, A., & Finseraas, H. (2011). The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: Causal effects of paternity leave. Social Science Research, 40(6), 1611–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.011

*Kvande, E., & Brandth, B. (2017). Individualized, non-transferable parental leave for European fathers: migrant perspectives. Community, Work and Family, 20(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2016.1270258

*Larsson, J., & Björk, S. (2017). Swedish fathers choosing part-time work. Community, Work & Family, 20(2), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1089839

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Lister, R. (2009). A Nordic Nirvana? Gender, Citizenship, and Social Justice in the Nordic Welfare States. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(2), 242–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp007

McKeown, S., & Mir, Z. M. (2021). Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01583-y

*McLean, C., Naumann, I., & Koslowski, A. (2017). Access to Childcare in Europe: Parents’ Logistical Challenges in Cross-national Perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12242

Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0

*Misra, J., Budig, M., & Boeckmann, I. (2011). Work-family policies and the effects of children on women’s employment hours and wages. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2011.571396

Newman, M., & Mathews, K. (1999). Federal Family-Friendly Workplace Policies: Barriers to Effective Implementation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(3), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9901900303

Oswald, A. G. (2019). Improving outcomes with Qualitative Data Analysis Software: A reflective journey. Qualitative Social Work, 18(3), 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017744860

Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Khalil, H., Larsen, P., Marnie, C., Pollock, D., Tricco, A. C., & Munn, Z. (2022). Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00242

*Rafnsdóttir, G. L., & Heijstra, T. M. (2013). Balancing Work-family Life in Academia: The Power of Time. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00571.x

Redaksi Marketplus. (2021). P&G Meluncurkan Kebijakan Cuti Terbaru untuk OrangTua. Marketplus.Co.Id. https://marketplus.co.id/2021/02/17/pg-meluncurkan-kebijakan-cuti-terbaru-untuk-orangtua/

*Rønsen, M., & Kitterød, R. H. (2015). Gender-Equalizing Family Policies and Mothers’ Entry into Paid Work: Recent Evidence From Norway. Feminist Economics, 21(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.927584

*Seierstad, C., & Kirton, G. (2015). Having It All? Women in High Commitment Careers and Work-Life Balance in Norway. Gender, Work and Organization, 22(4), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/GWAO.12099

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349(jan02 1), g7647–g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647

Shaw, R. L. (2010). Conducting Literature Reviews. In M. Forrester (Ed.), Doing qualitative research in psychology: a practical guide (pp. 39–56). SAGE. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Conducting-literature-reviews-Shaw/fe192ab71df5a99f2593a4924cc3bb8489619c8a#paper-header

*Sirovátka, T., & Válková, J. (2018). Attitudes towards childcare policies, policy feedback and path dependency: Czech Republic contrasted to Norway. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12303

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. In Annals of Internal Medicine (Vol. 169, Issue 7, pp. 467–473). American College of Physicians. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Undang-Undang Kesejahteraan Ibu dan Anak Pada Fase Seribu Hari Pertama Kehidupan, Pub. L. No. 98 (2024). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/349268/UU Nomor 4 Tahun 2024.pdf

Unilever Indonesia. (2021). Unilever Indonesia Umumkan Komitmen Baru Menuju Masyarakat Toleran dan Inklusif. Www.Unilever.Co.Id. https://www.unilever.co.id/news/press-releases/2021/unilever-indonesia-umumkan-komitmen-baru-menuju-masyarakat-toleran-dan-inklusif/