MASA KERJA, TIPE KEPRIBADIAN AGREEABLENESS, DAN ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR PADA KARYAWAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35760/psi.2025.v18i1.396Kata Kunci:
Agreeableness, Karyawan, Masa kerja, OCBAbstrak
Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) merupakan perilaku kerja positif yang sering ditemukan dalam berbagai organisasi dan perusahaan. Perilaku ini dinilai memberikan berbagai manfaat bagi organisasi karena dapat meningkatkan efektivitas kerja, kerja sama antarpegawai, serta mendukung pencapaian tujuan organisasi. Beberapa faktor yang diduga berperan dalam membentuk organizational citizenship behavior adalah masa kerja dan tipe kepribadian agreeableness. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris pengaruh masa kerja dan tipe kepribadian agreeableness terhadap organizational citizenship behavior pada karyawan. Sebanyak 105 karyawan yang bekerja di wilayah Jakarta terlibat sebagai partisipan dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain potong lintang, sementara data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner yang disebarkan secara daring. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masa kerja dan tipe kepribadian agreeableness berpengaruh terhadap organizational citizenship behavior. Selain itu, ditemukan bahwa tipe kepribadian agreeableness memberikan kontribusi yang lebih besar dibandingkan masa kerja dalam memengaruhi organizational citizenship behavior pada karyawan.
Referensi
Arumi, M. S., Aldrin, N., & Murti, T. R. (2019). Effect of organizational culture on organizational citizenship behavior with organizational commitment as a mediator. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 8(4), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v8i4.274
Atatsi, E. A., Stoffers, J., & Kil, A. (2021). Work tenure and organizational citizenship behaviors; A study in Ghanaian Technical Universities. Sustainability, 13(24), 13762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413762
Chao, G. T., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 730-743. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.730
Chen, Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K. M., Sucharski, I. L., & Aselage, J. (2009). Perceived organizational support and extra-role performance: Which leads to which? The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.1.119-124
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Dalam G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Personality measurement and testing (pp. 179–198). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9
da Silva, C. C., Vieira, K. M., Klein, L. L., Estivalete, F. D. F. B., & de Andrade, T. (2024). Organizational Citizenship Behavior Scale for knowledge workers: Empirical evidence and new validations. SAGE Open, 1-15. doi: 10.1177/ 21582440241247399
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438
Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T.A. (2006) The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 561-575. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794672
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Dalam L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 102-138). Guilford Press.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resources Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10. 1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). Organizational tenure and job performance. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1220-1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309359809
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com.
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage Publications.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theroetical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/014920630002600307
Ramdhani, N. (2012). Adaptasi bahasa dan budaya Inventori Big Five. Jurnal Psikologi, 39(2), 189-207. doi: 10.22146/jpsi.6986
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Jurnal Psikologi

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Universitas Gunadarma 