ADAPTASI SKALA PROSOCIALNESS FOR ADULT  VERSI BAHASA INDONESIA

Detri Sefianmi; Chandra Yudistira Purnama; Amir N. Setyadiredja

doi:10.35760/psi.2023.v16i1.7284

ADAPTASI SKALA PROSOCIALNESS FOR ADULT VERSI BAHASA INDONESIA

Detri Sefianmi
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Cimahi
Indonesia

Chandra Yudistira Purnama
orcid

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4930-9741
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Cimahi
Indonesia

Amir N. Setyadiredja
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Cimahi
Indonesia

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35760/psi.2023.v16i1.7284

Abstract

This study adapts and analyzes the psychometric properties of Prosocialness for Adults developed by Caprara in Indonesian with a sample of university students. The adaptation of this measuring instrument goes through several stages, starting from translation, back translation, testing the reliability coefficient, and collecting validity evidence in the form of content-based testing and internal structure testing using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). This study involved a sample of students in Bandung and Cimahi, as many as 273 students. The results showed that the Indonesian version of PSA Scale was declared reliable (alpha Cronbach = 0.841) and met the goodness of fit index criteria. Indonesian version of the PSA Scale measuring instrument has good psychometric properties, so it can be used for research or assessment purposes that measure degree prosocial in adolescent samples. This study suggests that the Indonesian version of the PSA Scale can be developed by adding a wider variety of samples, a larger sample size, and trying to relate to other variables to increase criterion validity

Keywords

Prosocial; PSA (Prosocialness fo Adult); CFA

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0013164485451012

Brittian, A. S., & Humphries, M. L. (2015). Prosocial behavior during adolescence. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (second edition) (pp. 221–227). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23190-5

Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77

Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239132

Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1023/ A:1014033032440

Crocker, J., Canevello, A., & Brown, A. A. (2017). Social motivation: Costs and benefits of selfishness and otherishness. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 299-325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044145

Dovidio, J. (2001). Adulthood: Prosocial behavior and empathy. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 159–162). Pergamon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01740-X

Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, Vol. 3, 5th ed. (pp. 701-778). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fitriah, A., & Fikrie, F. (2019). Perbedaan perilaku prososial pada remaja ditinjau dari jenis kelamin. Psycho Holistic, 1(1), 18-22. http://journal.umbjm.ac.id/index.php/psychoholistic18

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (Eight Edit). Cencage Learning.

Hanana, N. F. (2016). Pengaruh self-esteem dan kecerdasan emosional terhadap perilaku prososial. Tazkiya Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 85-100.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

International Test Commission. (2016). ITC guidlines for translating and adaptating test (second edition) (Second). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1975.tb00322.x

Kumru, A., Carlo, G., & Pope E. C. (2004). Altruism: Measurement, biological correlates and experimental paradigms View project Cross-Cultural Studies on Prosocial Behaviors View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286354991

Luria, G., Cnaan, R. A., & Boehm, A. (2015). National culture and prosocial behaviors: Results from 66 countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 1041–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014554456

Marbun, R., & Setiawan, J. L. (2019). Hubungan antara perilaku prososial dan psychological well-being pada remaja awal. Psychopreneur Journal, 3(2), 81–91.

Naibaho, R. M., Genturwati, T. G. K., & Utami, S. A. W. (2023). Hubungan antara partisipasi siswa dalam kegiatan sekolah dengan perilaku prososial pada siswa sekolah menengah Katolik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Katolik, 1, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.52110/jppak

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual website. Open University Press.

Purnama, C. Y., & Ernawati, L. (2021). A psychometric evaluation of the career decision making self-efficacy scale. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.39960

Ramadhani, A. N., Suroso, S., & Arifiana, I. Y. (2023). Perilaku prososial siswa reguler di sekolah inklusi: Bagaimana peranan relasi guru-siswa? INNER: Journal of Psychological Research, 2(4), 616–625.

Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). American Educational Research Association.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Trommsdorff, G., Friedlmeier, W., & Mayer, B. (2007). Sympathy, distress, and prosocial behavior of preschool children in four cultures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 284–293.

Wittek, R., & Bekkers, R. (2015). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior, Sociology of. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) (pp. 579–583). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32158-4