EFIKASI DIRI, KETERLIBATAN KERJA, DAN PERILAKU KERJA INOVATIF PADA GURU SMK
Universitas Gunadarma
Indonesia
Universitas Gunadarma
Indonesia
Abstract
Pandemi COVID-19 menciptakan perubahan besar, salah satunya dalam ranah pendidikan. Meskipun sistem pendidikan mengalami perubahan, peranan guru yang inovatif sangat dibutuhkan, terutama bagi jenjang Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK), di mana para lulusannya akan bersaing menempati posisi di organisasi yang semakin mengutamakan kemampuan berinovasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris mengenai pengaruh antara efikasi diri dan keterlibatan kerja terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif pada guru SMK. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, dan sebanyak 180 orang guru SMK terlibat sebagai sampel penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa efikasi diri dan keterlibatan kerja secara bersama-sama berpengaruh terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif pada guru SMK. Selain itu, efikasi diri ditemukan tidak berpengaruh terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif, sedangkan keterlibatan kerja ditemukan berpengaruh terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif pada guru SMK. Melalui penelitian ini, efikasi diri dan keterlibatan kerja secara bersama-sama menyumbang pengaruh sebesar 13.7% terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif, serta keterlibatan kerja menyumbang pengaruh sebesar 31.6% terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif pada guru SMK.
Keywords
References
Albrecht, S. L. (2010). Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Annida, S. D., & Harsanti, I. (2019). Challenge at work: Innovative work behavior among teachers. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 353, 202-205.
Ariyani, N., & Hidayati, S. (2018). Influence of transformational leadership and work engagement on innovative behavior. Etikonomi, 17(2), 275-284.
Aslan, H., & Kesik, F. (2018). An investigation of individual innovativeness characteristics of high school teachers according to certain variables. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(4), 2215-2228.
Atitumpong, A., & Badir, Y. F. (2017). Leader-member exchange, learning orientation, and innovative work behavior. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(1), 32-47.
Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2011). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44.
Bawuro, F. Shamsudin, A., Wahab, E., Adenuga, K. I., & Ndaghu, J. T. (2020). Motivational mechanisms on teachers’ innovative behaviour – A systematic review approach. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 239-245.
Choi, M. H., & Min, H. H. (2020). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy on innovative behavior of clinical dental hygienists. Journal of Korean Society of Dental Hygiene, 20(2), 167-174.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
Etikariena, A. (2018). Perbedaan perilaku kerja inovatif berdasarkan karakteristik individu karyawan. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 107-118.
Gemeda, H., & Lee, J. (2020). Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among information and communications technology professionals: A cross- national study. Heliyon, 6, 1-10.
Hakkanen, J. J., Ropponen, A., Schaufeli, W., & Witte, H. D. (2019). Who is engaged at work? A large-scale study in 30 European countries. Journal of Occcupation and Environment Medicine, 61(5), 373-381.
Hashim, N. H., Yaakob, M. F. M, Yusof, M. R., & Ibrahim, M. Y. (2019). Innovative behavior among teachers: Empirical evidence from high- performance schools. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(10), 1695-1699.
Hidayat, S., & Saleh, M. (2019). Komparasi kemampuan kerja antara lulusan SMA dan SMK di industri permesinan modern. Jurnal IKRA-ITH Ekonomika, 2(3), 45-56.
Hosseini, S., & Shirazi, Z. R. H. (2021). Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-19.
Hsiao, H. C., Chang, J. C., Tu, Y. L., & Chen, S. C. (2011). The impact of self-efficacy on innovative work behavior or teachers. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(1), 31-36.
Izzati, U. A. (2017). The relationship between vocational high school teachers’ organizational climate and innovative behavior. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 173, 343-345.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perception of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.
Kaihatu, T. S., & Rini, W. A. (2007). Kepemimpinan transformasional dan pengaruhnya terhadap kepuasan atas kualitas kehidupan kerja, komitmen organisasi, dan perilaku ekstra peran: Studi pada guru-guru SMU di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 98(1), 49-61.
Kaur, K. D., & Gupta, V. (2016). The impact of personal characteristics on innovative work behaviour: An exploration into innovation and its determinants amongst teachers. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(3), 158-172.
Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations. Sustainability, 9,1- 16.
Li, M., Liu, Y., Liu, L., & Wang, Z. (2017). Proactive personality and innovative work behavior: The mediating effect of affective states and creative self-efficacy in teachers. Current Psychology, 36, 697-706.
Liu, Z., Ge, L., & Peng, W. (2016). How organizational tenure affects innovative behavior? The role of culture difference and status determinants. Nankai Business Review International, 7(1), 99-126.
Ma, K., Chutiyami, M., Zhang, Y., & Nicoll, S. (2021). Online teaching self- efficacy during COVID-19: Changes, its associated factors and moderators. Education and Information Technologies.
