PENGEMBANGAN ALAT UKUR CAREER SATISFACTION PADA KARYAWAN REMOTE WORK
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Indonesia
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Indonesia
Abstract
Today's technological advances enable a variety of people to work from anywhere without being stuck in one place. Career satisfaction becomes a study to see how employees remotely view career satisfaction. The research aims to develop a career satisfaction measure to investigate how a remote employee perceives his or her professional satisfaction. This research uses a quantitative approach with the sampling method used in this research using purposive sampling techniques. The sample in this study is employees who work remotely or can work from anywhere within 200 participants. The data collection uses a career satisfaction scale that has been modified and rearranged by the researchers. Measurement of career satisfaction measurements using confirmatory factor analysis techniques resulted in CFI 0.976, TLI 0.957, and SRMR 0.0254 goodness fit. Then reliability on the scale with the alpha value Cronbach 0.940. In addition, the value of the rest-correlation item ranges from 0.645 to 0.829 with a very good category so that the measurement can measure the level of career satisfaction for employees
Keywords
References
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings, educational, and psychological measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142.
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Barnett, B. R., & Bradley, L. (2007). The impact of organizational support for career development on career satisfaction. Career Development International, 12(7), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710834396
Bean, G. J., & Bowen, N. K. (2021). Item response theory and confirmatory factor analysis: Complementary approaches for scale development. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 18(6), 597-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2021.1906813
Brown, T. A. (2022). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 36(4), 462–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
Dessler, G., & Varkkey, B. (2018). Human resource management (fifteenth). Pearson.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/256352
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2017). Multivariate Data Analysis (MVDA). In Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: A Practical Approach. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895238.ch8
Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2019a). Multivariate Data Analysis, Multivariate Data Analysis. In Book (Vol. 87, Issue 4). www.cengage.com/highered
Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2019b). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Book (Vol. 87, Issue 4). www.cengage.com/highered
Kong, H., Cheung, C., & Song, H. (2012). From hotel career management to employees’ career satisfaction: The mediating effect of career competency. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.03.002
Kurniawan, A. E., & Kusumastuti, R. (2023). Studi bibliometrik topik riset kepuasan karir anggota Kepolisian Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7454/ jvi.v11i1.1038
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
Nabi, G. R. (1999). An investigation into the differential profile of predictors of objective and subjective career success. Career Development International, 4(4), 212-225. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/13620439910270599
Pangestu, H. (2013). Pengaruh manajemen karir terhadap kepuasan karir melalui kompetensi pegawai. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa, 5, 8–9.
Peter, J. P. (1981). Construct validity: A review of basic issues and marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150948
Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055196 09540052
Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The Five-Factor Model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757
Spurk, D., Abele, A. E., & Volmer, J. (2011). The Career Satisfaction Scale: Longitudinal measurement invariance and latent growth analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02028.x
Spurk, D., Abele, A. E., & Volmer, J. (2015). The Career Satisfaction Scale in context: A test for measurement invariance across four occupational groups. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714535019
Umar, J., & Nisa, Y. F. (2020). Uji validitas konstruk dengan CFA dan pelaporannya. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i. v9i2.16964
