ADAPTASI ALAT UKUR DIFFERENTIATED PROCESS SCALE OF SELF-FORGIVENESS

Reva Febiana; Mohammad Nursalim Malay; Citra Wahyuni

doi:10.35760/psi.2024.v17i2.11103

ADAPTASI ALAT UKUR DIFFERENTIATED PROCESS SCALE OF SELF-FORGIVENESS

Reva Febiana
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Indonesia

Mohammad Nursalim Malay
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Indonesia

Citra Wahyuni
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Indonesia

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35760/psi.2024.v17i2.11103

Abstract

Self-forgiveness has been proven to greatly benefit an individual's mental health and help them live a better life. This study aims to adapt a measuring instrument using Rasch modeling to obtain a valid and quality measuring instrument. In addition, the Rasch model can also predict missing data, evaluate the similarity of answers, and identify the seriousness of respondents. In adapting the measuring instrument, 6 stages must be carried out. The research subjects were 214 participants selected using convenience sampling with the criteria of early adulthood aged 18-25 years. Overall, this adaptation can be said to be good in measuring the construct of self-forgiveness in the context of Indonesian culture based on testing the Rasch model. The results of the data analysis that have been carried out using the Rasch model are that for person reliability it gets a value of 0.83 while for item reliability it gets a value of 0.99. The average value of INFIT MNSQ and OUTFIT MNSQ in people is 0.98 and 1.00, and in items, it is also 0.98 and 1.00. A value approaching 1.00 is considered good. For INFIT ZSTD and OUTFIT ZSTD, the average values for individuals were -0.2 and -0.1, while for items they were -0.3 and 0.0, with the ideal value approaching 0.0. The results show that these values are classified as good. In addition to obtaining an accurate measuring instrument, this study is also useful in clinical practice so that it can be used to identify and overcome obstacles in the self-forgiveness process.

Keywords

Self-forgiveness; Model Rasch; Adaptasi alat ukur

References

Alagumalai, S., Curtis, D. D., & Hungi, N. (2005). Applied Rasch Measurement : a Book of Exemplars Education in the Asia- Pacific Region : Issues , Concerns and Prospects. 353.

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Dentists’ selection of measures for assessment of oral health risk factors for Finnish young adults. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 57(4), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428823

Chan, S., Looi, C., & Sumintono, B. (2020). Assessing computational thinking abilities among Singapore secondary students : A Rasch model measurement analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(2), 213–236.

Cornish, M. A., & Wade, N. G. (2015). A therapeutic model of self-forgiveness with intervention strategies for counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 93(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00185.x

Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2019). Self-forgiveness and well-being: Does divine forgiveness matter? Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(6), 854–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1579361

Habibi, M. M., & Hidayati, F. (2018). Hubungan Antara Pemaafan Diri Sendiri, Pemaafan Orang Lain, Dan Pemaafan Situasi Dengan Resiliensi Pada Mahasiswa Baru (Studi Korelasi Pada Mahasiswa Baru Universitas Diponegoro Semarang). Empati, 6(2), 62–69.

Handayani, N. D. P. (2021). Hubungan Antara Pemaafan Diri Dengan Kesejahteraan Psikologis Pada Narapidana Perempuan di Lapas Kelas IIA Kota Semarang 1. Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 52–60.

Istiqomah. (2004). Pengembangan skala forgiveness. 101(3), 55. http://eprints.uanl.mx/5481/1/1020149995.PDF

Khine, M. S. (2020). Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research. In Rasch Measurement: Applications in Quantitative Educational Research (Issue September). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1800-3

Kusumaningrum, N. A. D., & Jannah, M. (2023). Representasi Quarter Life Crisis Pada Dewasa Awal Ditinjau Berdasarkan Demografi. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 10(2), 18–27. https://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/psikoneo/article/download/4533/pdf

Landfeldt, E., Iff, J., Henricson, E., Vishwanathan, V., Chidambaranathan, S., Biggar, W. D., McAdam, L. C., Mah, J. K., Tulinius, M., Cnaan, A., Morgenroth, L. P., Leshner, R., TesiRocha, C., Thangarajh, M., Duong, T., Kornberg, A., Ryan, M., Nevo, Y., Dubrovsky, A., … McDonald, C. M. (2021). Rasch Analysis of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales Administered to Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Value in Health, 24(10), 1490–1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.016

Larasati, D. A., & Widyastuti, T. (2020). Pengembangan skala pemaafan diri. Acta Psychologia, 2(1), 80–90. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/acta-psychologia%0APengembangan

PDSKJI. (2022). Masalah Psikologis 2 Tahun Pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia. Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Kedokteran Jiwa Indonesia. http://www.pdskji.org/home

Perdana, S. A. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Pengukuran Pemahaman Konsep Persamaan Kuadrat Melalui Teori Tes Klasik Dan Rasch Model. Jurnal Kiprah, 6(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v6i1.574

Ramadhani, H. M., & K. D. Ambarwati. (2021). Self-Forgiveness On Men Whose Partners Have a Premarital Abortions. 12(3), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.24036/XXXXXXXXXX-X

Robinson, O. C. (2018). A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Case Study of Quarter-Life Crisis During the Post-university Transition: Locked-Out and Locked-In Forms in Combination. Emerging Adulthood, 7(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818764144

Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarsono, W. (2014). APLIKASI RASCH MODEL UNTUK PENELITIAN ILMU-ILMU SOSIAL (B. Trim (ed.); 1st ed.). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Synder C.R, & Mccullough, M. E. (2000). a Positive Psychology Field of Dreams : Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 151–160.

Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S., Heinze, L., Neufeld, J. E., Shorey, H. S., Roberts, J. C., & Roberts, D. E. (2005a). Dispositionol forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 313–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00311.x

Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S., Heinze, L., Neufeld, J. E., Shorey, H. S., Roberts, J. C., & Roberts, D. E. (2005b). Dispositionol forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 313–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00311.x

Toussaint, L. L., Webb, J. R., & Hirsch, J. K. (2017). Self-forgiveness and health: A stress-and-coping model. In Handbook of the Psychology of Self-Forgiveness (pp. 87–99). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60573-9_7

Wahyudi, A. (2020). Analisis Model Rasch Pada Pengembangan Skala Resiliensi. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 6(2), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.52657/jfk.v6i2.1157

Wibisono, S. (2018). The application of rasch model for moslem fundamentalism instrument validation [In Bahasa]. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I), 5(1).

Wohl, M. J. A., DeShea, L., & Wahkinney, R. L. (2008). Looking within: Measuring state self-forgiveness and its relationship to psychological well-being. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400x.40.1.1.1

Wohl, M. J. A., & McLaughlin, K. J. (2014). Self-forgiveness: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(8), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12119

Woodyatt, L., & Wenzel, M. (2013). Self-forgiveness and restoration

of an offender following an interpersonal transgression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(2), 225–259. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2013.32.2.225

Yunanto, T. A. R., & Putra, D. A. A. (2023). Pengalaman Mencapai Flourishing pada Masa Quarter-Life Crisis. Journal of Psychological Science and Profession, 7(3), 236. https://doi.org/10.24198/jpsp.v7i3.49496