Kompetensi Komunikasi Antarbudaya Dalam Kolektivitas Termediatisasi

Reza Praditya Yudha; Gita Aprinta E. Betseba

doi:10.35760/mkm.2025.v9i2.449

Penulis

Reza Praditya Yudha Universitas Gunadarma Penulis
Gita Aprinta E. Betseba Universitas Gunadarma Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35760/mkm.2025.v9i2.449

Kata Kunci:

deep mediatization, intercultural communication competence, media practice, mediatized collectivities

Abstrak

The growing process of deep mediatization has transformed intercultural encounters from predominantly interpersonal interactions into communicative practices embedded within digitally connected collectivities. This article aims to reconceptualize intercultural communication competence by situating it within the context of mediatized collectivities. Employing a qualitative approach with a conceptual desk study design, the study synthesizes contemporary scholarship on intercultural communication, mediatization, media practice, and digital ethnography through thematic and integrative analysis. The findings indicate that conventional approaches to intercultural communication competence, which primarily emphasize cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions, are insufficient to explain communication practices occurring within collectivities constituted through media environments. The study demonstrates that media-related practices play a constitutive role in shaping collective identities, social relations, and shared meanings. Accordingly, this article proposes a conceptual framework of intercultural communication competence consisting of cognitive, affective, behavioral, and collective dimensions. The framework offers a theoretical bridge between intercultural communication studies and mediatization research and provides a foundation for future investigations of communication in increasingly mediatized societies.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). Verso.

Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being “systematic” in literature reviews. In Formulating research methods for information systems (pp. 161–173). Palgrave Macmillan.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002

Deardorff, D. K. (2020). Manual for developing intercultural competencies: Story circles. UNESCO.

Dervin, F., & Yuan, M. (2023). Examining other ways of engaging with interculturality. In F. Dervin & M. Yuan (Eds.), Interculturality and the political within education (pp. xx–xx). Routledge.

Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society. Free Press. (Original work published 1893)

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.

Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of effective communication. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 281–322). Sage.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.

Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization. Routledge.

Hepp, A., Breiter, A., & Hasebrink, U. (Eds.). (2018). Communicative figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hiswanti, H., Savitri, R., & Ohorella, N. R. (2024). Strategi komunikasi pengelolaan website Desa Ciangsana berbasis masyarakat. Mediakom: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.35760/mkm.2024.v8i1.11166

Holmes, P., & O’Neill, G. (2012). Developing and evaluating intercultural competence: Ethnographies of intercultural encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(5), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.04.010

Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press.

Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Sage.

Lim, M. (2021). Rhythm and algorithm of culture [Pidato Kebudayaan Dewan Kesenian Jakarta]. Dewan Kesenian Jakarta.

Nugroho, Y. (2022). Digital citizenship and civic engagement in Indonesia. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.

Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tönnies, F. (1957). Community and society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). Michigan State University Press. (Original work published 1887)

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606