"Anak Abah VS Warga 58%" Etnografi Virtual: Analisis Wacana Pertengkaran Politik Warganet Indonesia di Kolom Komentar di Kolom Komentar di Media Sosial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35760/mkm.2026.v10i1.204Kata Kunci:
anak abah, political quarrels, social media, Virtual Ethnography, 58%Abstrak
This study analyzes the dynamics of political debates on social media following the 2024 Presidential Election, focusing on the group identities of “anak abah” and “warga 58%” through a virtual ethnography approach. The findings highlight four key points. First, identity politics demonstrates a stronger and more enduring bond than the electoral moment itself, as group identities are constructed through symbols, language, and emotional experiences that persist beyond the political event. Second, collective emotions such as anger and pride do not dissipate after the campaign; instead, they continue to reinforce solidarity through ongoing digital interactions. Third, social media algorithms intensify the persistence of these conflicts by creating spaces that circulate similar content and prolong cycles of debate. Fourth, this phenomenon reflects symbolic polarization, in which labels such as “anak abah” and “warga 58%” function as markers of political identity that extend beyond the presidential election in which they originated. Thus, social media becomes a stage for reinterpreting political reality, where citizens’ real-world choices are transformed into concise, symbolic, and emotionally charged digital narratives.
Unduhan
Referensi
Ani, L.F., Aminudin, I. and Rengi, P. 2022. Pengaruh media sosial terhadap literasi politik generasi milenial. Mediakom: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. 6(1), pp.46–55.
Bungin, B. 2023. Netnography: Social Media Research Procedure, Big Data & Cybercommunity 1st ed. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.
Bungin, B. 2006. Sosiologi komunikasi: teori, paradima, dan diskursus teknologi komunikasi di masyarakat.
Tang, J., Yu, G., & Yao, X. (2021). Emotional Contagion in the Online Depression Community. Healthcare, 9(12), 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121609
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Corkum, M. and Shead, N.W. 2023. Online moral disengagement: An examination of the relationships between electronic communication, cognitive empathy, and antisocial behavior on the internet. Psychological Reports., p.00332941231216415.
Esau, K., Choucair, T., Vilkins, S., Svegaard, S.F.K., Bruns, A., O’Connor-Farfan, K.S. and Lubicz-Zaorski, C. 2025. Destructive polarization in digital communication contexts: a critical review and conceptual framework. Information, Communication & Society. 28(8), pp.1499–1520.
Hine, C. 2017. From virtual ethnography to the embedded, embodied, everyday internet In: The Routledge companion to digital ethnography. Routledge, pp.47–54.
Hutapea, E.K., Santoso, P., Alexandra, H.F.S., Sukendro, A. and Widodo, P. 2023. Tantangan Dan Upaya Penanganan Politik Identitas Pada Pemilu 2024. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan. 7(1), pp.424–434.
Joinson, A. 1999. Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers. 31(3), pp.433–438.
Judijanto, L., Wandan, H., Ayu, N., Triyantoro, A. and Suroso, S. 2024. Pengaruh Politik Identitas dan Penggunaan Media Sosial terhadap Partisipasi Politik Digital Pemilih Milenial dan Gen Z di Indonesia. Sanskara Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora. 2(01), pp.24–35.
Kaiser, J., Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2022). Partisan Blocking: Biased Responses to Shared Misinformation Contribute to Network Polarization on Social Media. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac002
Kozinets, R. V. 2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Literat, I. and Kligler-Vilenchik, N. 2023. TikTok as a key platform for youth political expression: Reflecting on the opportunities and stakes involved. Social Media+ Society. 9(1), p.20563051231157596.
Reicher, S., Spears, R. and Haslam, S.A. 2010. The social identity approach in social psychology. Sage identities handbook., pp.45–62.
Rizanul, R.C., Egistin, D., Jasmine, A. and Juniarto, D. 2025. Analisis Peran Media Sosial (TikTok) dalam Dinamika Partisipasi Politik pada Pemilu Presiden 2024. Journal of Social Contemplativa. 3(1), pp.51–61.
Rohmah, I.Y.A. 2023. Imajinasi Ruang Politik Digital: Identitas, Ekspresi, dan Kontestasi Politisi di Indonesia. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Sosiologi (PKNS). 1(2), pp.3–15.
Tajfel, H. 2010. Social identity and intergroup behaviour.
Wingarta, I.P.S., Helmy, B., Hartono, D., Mertadana, I.W. and Wicaksono, R. 2021. Pengaruh Politik Identitas Terhadap Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lemhannas RI. 9(4), pp.117–124.
Young, L. E. (2023). Mobilization Under Threat: Emotional Appeals and Pro-Opposition Political Participation Online. Political Behavior, 45(2), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09711-z
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Mediakom : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Download Journal Template (DOCX)