Autentisitas Influencer, Hubungan Parasosial, dan Kepercayaan Generasi Z terhadap Influencer TikTok

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35760/mkm.2026.v10i1.472

Keywords:

Generation Z, influencer authenticity, parasocial relationship, TikTok, trust in influencers

Abstract

This study examines influencer authenticity and parasocial relationship as predictors of trust in TikTok influencers among Generation Z users in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Trust is treated as an audience judgment directed at the influencer as a communication source rather than merely as brand trust or purchase intention. A cross-sectional online survey involved 492 eligible respondents aged 18–26 years. To strengthen instrument validation, the sample was randomly divided into a calibration subsample (n = 246) and a validation subsample (n = 246). The questionnaire used a five-point Likert scale and 15 core indicators. In the calibration subsample, all retained items showed corrected item–total correlations above 0.40. In the validation subsample, a three-factor confirmatory model showed good fit (CFI = 0.977; TLI = 0.972; RMSEA = 0.037). Multiple regression with HC3 heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors indicated that authenticity (β = 0.369; p < 0.001) and parasocial relationship (β = 0.441; p < 0.001) were positively associated with trust. The model explained 55.2% of the variance in trust. Commonality analysis showed unique contributions of 7.3% for authenticity and 10.4% for parasocial relationship, while 37.5% was explained jointly. A 5,000-resample bootstrap indicated that the difference between standardized coefficients was not statistically reliable. Trust in TikTok influencers is therefore better understood as being associated with intertwined evaluative and relational processes rather than with the dominance of a single predictor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkan, Z., & Ulaş, S. (2023). Trust in social media influencers and purchase intention: An empirical analysis. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(1), e202301. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12783

Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008

Balaban, D. C., & Szambolics, J. (2022). A proposed model of self-perceived authenticity of social media influencers. Media and Communication, 10(1), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4765

Barta, S., Belanche, D., Fernández, A., & Flavián, M. (2023). Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103149

Boyd, A. T., Rocconi, L. M., & Morrow, J. A. (2024). Construct validation and measurement invariance of the Parasocial Relationships in Social Media survey. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0300356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300356

Han, J., & Balabanis, G. (2024). Meta-analysis of social media influencer impact: Key antecedents and theoretical foundations. Psychology & Marketing, 41(2), 394–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21927

Hogsnes, M., & Grønli, T. M. (2025). A commercial playground: Investigating TikTok influencers’ commercial content. Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2588348

Joshi, Y., Lim, W. M., Jagani, K., & Kumar, S. (2025). Social media influencer marketing: Foundations, trends, and ways forward. Electronic Commerce Research, 25(2), 1199–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09719-z

Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, 17. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17

Karagür, Z., Becker, J., Klein, K., & Edeling, A. (2022). How, why, and when disclosure type matters for influencer marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(2), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.09.006

Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024

Lai, J., Zou, Y., Zhang, J., & Peres-Neto, P. R. (2022). Generalizing hierarchical and variation partitioning in multiple regression and canonical analyses using the rdacca. hp R package. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(4), 782–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13800

Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267

Lee, J. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2021). Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: Scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2020-0253

Liu, X., & Zheng, X. (2024). The persuasive power of social media influencers in brand credibility and purchase intention. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02512-1

Lacap, J. P. G., Cruz, M. R. M., Bayson, A. J., Molano, R., & Garcia, J. G. (2024). Parasocial relationships and social media interactions: building brand credibility and loyalty. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 28(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-09-2022-0190

Mansournia, M. A., Nazemipour, M., Naimi, A. I., Collins, G. S., & Campbell, M. J. (2021). Reflection on modern methods: Demystifying robust standard errors for epidemiologists. International Journal of Epidemiology, 50(1), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa260

Nabiilah, F., & Jayanti, K. (2025). Kontruksi Identitas Sosial Generasi Z Melalui Interaksi Dengan ChatGPT. Mediakom: Jurnal IImu Komunikasi, 9(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.35760/mkm.2025.v9i1.14458

Pérez-Guerrero, E. E., Guillén-Medina, M. R., Márquez-Sandoval, F., Vera-Cruz, J. M., Gallegos-Arreola, M. P., Rico-Méndez, M. A., Aguilar-Velázquez, J. A., & Gutiérrez-Hurtado, I. A. (2024). Methodological and Statistical Considerations for Cross-Sectional, Case–Control, and Cohort Studies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(14), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144005

Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common Method Bias : It ’ s Bad , It ’ s Complex , It ’ s Widespread , and It ’ s Not Easy to Fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11 , 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030

Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020). “You really are a great big sister”: Parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781

Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity versus influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898

Sheng, J., Lee, Y. H., & Lan, H. (2024). Parasocial relationships with micro-influencers: Do sponsorship disclosure and electronic word-of-mouth disrupt? Internet Research, 34(3), 849–867. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2021-0903

Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011

Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12647

Weismueller, J., Harrigan, P., Wang, S., & Soutar, G. N. (2020). Influencer endorsements: How advertising disclosure and source credibility affect consumer purchase intention on social media. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.03.002

Zniva, R., Weitzl, W. J., & Lindmoser, C. (2023). Be constantly different! How to manage influencer authenticity. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(3), 1485–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09653-6

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Naufaijlal, R., & Widyatama, R. (2026). Autentisitas Influencer, Hubungan Parasosial, dan Kepercayaan Generasi Z terhadap Influencer TikTok. Mediakom : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(1), 62-81. https://doi.org/10.35760/mkm.2026.v10i1.472

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.