CONFIDENCE SHOCKS IN EMERGING MARKETS AND THEIR GLOBAL CONTAGION: INSIGHTS FROM G-CUBED SIMULATIONS
Politeknik Statistika STIS
Indonesia
Politeknik Statistika STIS
Indonesia
Abstract
The global economy has begun to recover from the global financial crisis (GFC), which occurred around 10 years ago, according to recent economic statistics. However, investor confidence has declined in a number of significant emerging markets (EMEs) due to rising interest rates in the US and ongoing trade tensions between the US and China, potentially causing contagion effects worldwide. The worldwide impacts of the financial crisis in certain important EMEs, namely Argentina, Brazil, Turkey, and Russia (ABTR), as well as its widespread impact on raising global investment and consumption risk, are examined in this paper using the G-Cubed model for G-20 nations with six sectors. According to the findings, because three distinct shocks struck at the same time in ABTR countries—where the initial shock emerged—they experience the most negative short-term effects of the confidence crisis. The cost of capital rises as a result of the capital outflow from these nations, which causes firms to disinvest or reduce their capital stock. Households across all nations are also more likely to discount future income streams as a result of their increased risk assessment, which promotes more savings and lower spending. Additionally, both developed and non-shocked emerging countries grew as a result of increased capital inflows, but their trade balances worsened due to exchange rate appreciation, which made the production decline worse.
Keywords
References
Carrière-Swallow, Y & Céspedes, LF 2013, ‘The impact of uncertainty shocks in emerging economies’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 316–325.
Eicher, TS, Schubert, SF & Turnovsky, SJ 2008, ‘Dynamic effects of terms of trade shocks: The impact on debt and growth’, Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 876–896.
Gaddy, CG & Ickes, BW 2010, ‘Russia after the Global Financial Crisis’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 281–311.
Henderson, DW & McKibbin, WJ 1993, ‘A comparison of some basic monetary policy regimes for open economies: implications of different degrees of instrument adjustment and wage persistence’, 458, International Finance Discussion Papers, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), viewed 7 November 2019, .
IMF see International Monetary Fund
International Monetary Fund 2019a, World Economic Outlook, October 2019: Global Manufacturing Downturn, Rising Trade Barriers n.d., IMF, viewed 6 November 2019, .
International Monetary Fund 2019b, ‘Economic outlook and risk’, Development Committee: The Managing Director’s Written Statement, viewed in 7 November 2019,
.
McKibbin, WJ & Triggs, A 2018, ‘Modelling the G20’, CAMA Working Paper, No. 17, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Australian National University, viewed 7 November 2019,
.
McKibbin, WJ & Stoeckel, A 2009, ‘Modelling the global financial crisis’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 581–607.
Ozkan, FG & Unsal, DF 2012, ‘Global Financial Crisis, Financial Contagion, and Emerging Markets’, IMF Working Papers, vol. 12, no. 293, p. 1.
Taylor, JB 1993, ‘Discretion versus policy rules in practice’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol. 39, pp. 195–214.
Word Bank 2017, ‘Global economic prospect’, Weak investment in uncertain time, viewed in 7 November 2019,
.