COGNITIVE CONCEPTUALISATIONS OF POLITICAL EUPHEMISTIC EXPRESSIONS

Suparto Suparto
Universitas Gunadarma
Indonesia
Ayyuhatsanail Fithri
Universitas Gunadarma
Indonesia

Abstract

This paper discusses political euphemistic expressions from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. It is human to say something naturally and socially acceptable, emotionally not irritating, logically intelligible, and communicatively inter-translatable. Euphemistic expression is a way with which language speakers’ experiences can be linguistically and cognitively manifested. As a soft word or expression which is used to denote to things about which people may find disappointing or embarrassing to talk, euphemistic expressions enable to say something impossible possible. Introspection as a deep understanding of any language speaker to his/her language system on any talks is used as the data analyzing method. Research data is taken from online mass media. The research data focuses on politically related euphemistic expressions. The accounts of Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) are used to give insights into the cognitive mechanism of euphemistic expressions. Political euphemistic expressions are logically intelligible. The research findings demonstrate that there are two basic motivations of euphemizing political expressions. The two are function and characteristics. The internalization of language speaker to the primordial nature of something to euphemize is the key to understand the way to construct the euphemistic expressions.

Keywords
characteristics; cognitive linguistics; euphemistic expression; function
References

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: taboo and the censoring of

language. Cambridge University Press.

Burridge, K. (2012). Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis.

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.

Evans, V., Bergen, B. K., & Zinken, J. (2007). The cognitive cinguistics cnterprise: An Overview . The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. Equinox..

Fowler, R. W. (1993). A dictionary of euphemisms. Oxford University Press.

Gardenfors, P. (1999). Some tenets of cognitive semantics. In Allwood. J & Gardenfors. P (Eds.). Cognitive semantics: Meaning and cognition. John Benjamins

Publishing Company.

Gramley, S. & Pätzold, K. (2004). A survey of modern English. Routledge.

Lakoff, R. (1990). Talking power: the politics of language in ourlLives. Basic Books.

Oudah, B. K. Euphemisms & cognitive linguistics. https://www.academia.edu/33566461/EUPHEMISMS_COGNITIVE_LINGUISTICS).

Rao, V.C.S. (2021). Cognitive linguistics: An approach to the study of language and thought. Journal of Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3817460 Vol. 5. Issue 24.

Talmy, L. (2007). Forward. In Marquez, M. G., Mittelberg, I, & Coulson, S., et.al. (Edt.). Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. xi-xxi). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Walker, A.C., Martin Harry Turpin, Ethan A. Meyers, Jennifer A. Stolz, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Derek J. Koehler. (2021). Controlling the narrative: Euphemistic language affects judgments of actions while avoiding perceptions of dishonesty. Journal of Cognition (211) 104633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104633 .

Taylor, J. R., & Littlemore, J. (2014). Introduction. In Taylor, J. R. & J. Littlemore. J. (Edt.). The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp.1-26). Bloomsbury.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Blackwell Publishing.

Zhao, X. & Dong. J.(2010). Study on the features of English political euphemism

and its social functions. 1(1) Journal of English Language Teaching.

Information
PDF
271 times PDF : 201 times