COMMUNICATION PATTERNS IN MATAHARIKITA.CO VIRTUAL COMMUNITY BATCH 11 IN BUILDING SOLIDARITY

Cholidah Astri Astri Pertiwi
Universitas Gunadarma
Indonesia
Tiffani Iqlima Alfiana
Universitas Gunadarma
Indonesia
Nuke Farida
Universitas Gunadarma
Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to determine the communication patterns in the Mataharikita.co community batch 11 in building solidarity between members and between members and administrators. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative research method and using a constructivist paradigm. Data collection techniques used in the form of in-depth  interviews  with  members  and  administrators  in  the Mataharikita.co, observation, and documentation. The theory used is the Symbolic Interactionism theory. The results of the study show that the communication pattern model that occurs in the Mataharikita.co batch 11 is a pattern of all channels or what is known as a star pattern that involves all members and administrators in communicating, thus encouraging a sense of family as a whole that can help build solidarity in the Mataharikita.co. An open communication pattern not only facilitates the exchange  of  information,  but  also  strengthens  mutual  trust, responsibility, respect between members and administrators and togetherness between each other. Thus, this communication pattern plays an important role in creating a supportive and mutually reinforcing environment, making Mataharikita.co a place that is not only productive, but also full of togetherness and concern among its members.

 

Keywords
Virtual Community; Symbolic Interactionism Theory; Solidarity; Communication Patterns.
References

Chaskin, R. J. (2001). Building community capacity: A definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870122184876

Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 1–15.

Kuncoroyakti, Y. A., Ohorella, N. R., & Umam, C. (2020). Pola Komunikasi Komunitas Kicau Mania di Kota Depok Dalam Membangun Solidaritas Anggota. Jurnal Communicology, 8(2), 201–216.

Pradayu, M. (2022). Pengaruh Aktivitas Organisasi Terhadap Prestasi Belajar (Studi Kasus Pengurus BEM Universitas Riau Kabinet Inspirasi Periode). Jom Fisip, 4(2), 1–13.

Preece, J., & Maloney-Krichmar, D. (2005). Online Communities: Design, Theory, and Practice. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 38, pp. 433–472). https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440380112

Safrudin, R., Zulfamanna, Kustati, M., & Sepriyanti, N. (2023). Penelitian Kualitatif.

Sahputra, Tanjung Amran; Purba Anggi Martuah, & Muhammad Mahadir. (2022). Pemahaman terhadap Teori-Teori Organisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(4), 5816–5823.

Seran, A. F., Daga, L. L., & Tuhana, V. E. (2023). Pola Komunikasi Organisasi Dalam Mempertahankan Solidaritas Anggota. Deliberatio: Jurnal Mahasiswa Komunikasi, 2(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.59895/DELIBERATIO.V2I1.26

Wajdi, F. R. A. (2023). Pola Komunikasi Organisasi Dalam Perkaderan Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam [HMI] Cabang Palembang Darussalam. Jurnal MINARTIS. https://jurnal.minartis.com/index.php/jkomdis/article/view779

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.

Surokim. (2016). Riset Komunikasi : Buku Pendamping Bimbingan Skripsi. Pusat Kajian Komunikasi Publik Prodi Ilmu Komunikasi FISIB-UTM & Aspikom Jawa Timur,

Information
PDF
67 times PDF : 8 times