PENGARUH DESAIN PENEDUH PADA SELUBUNG BANGUNAN TERHADAP KONSUMSI ENERGI BANGUNAN PENDIDIKAN DI KAWASAN PERKOTAAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SIMULASI EDGE

Khalid Abdul Mannan; Rahma Purisari; Zaki Saptari Saldi; Titus Adi Kurniawan

doi:10.35760/dk.2025.v24i2.226

Authors

Khalid Abdul Mannan University of Mataram Author
Rahma Purisari Universitas Pembangunan Jaya Author
Zaki Saptari Saldi Universitas Pembangunan Jaya Author
Titus Adi Kurniawan Universitas Pembangunan Jaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35760/dk.2025.v24i2.226

Keywords:

efisiensi energi, selubung bangunan, annual average shading factor, EDGE, bangunan pendidikan

Abstract

Bangunan pendidikan termasuk tipe bangunan dengan jam operasional tinggi, dan kebutuhan energi yang signifikan, terutama di kawasan perkotaan dengan iklim tropis. Studi ini bertujuan mengevaluasi pengaruh desain peneduh pada selubung bangunan terhadap konsumsi energi bangunan pendidikan di area perkotaan. Studi kasus dilakukan di Ruang 502 Gedung A Universitas Pembangunan Jaya (UPJ), yang merepresentasikan ruang kelas dengan paparan sinar matahari langsung. Metode penelitian menggunakan simulasi energi dengan software EDGE (Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies) dengan variasi ukuran peneduh horizontal (Overhang Depth/ODe), peneduh vertikal (Fin Depth/FDe), dan kombinasi peneduh horizontal dan vertikal (ODe+FDe) untuk menentukan dampaknya pada konsumsi energi tahunan bangunan. Hasil simulasi menunjukkan peningkatan dimensi peneduh berkontribusi pada pengurangan konsumsi energi pada bangunan. Tingkat efisiensi energi meningkat secara bertahap seiring dengan bertambahnya ukuran peneduh, dengan efisiensi tertinggi pada konfigurasi gabungan ODe+FDe pada 1,6 m, menghasilkan penghematan energi hingga 2,11%, bila dibandingkan dengan kondisi tanpa peneduh. Nilai Annual Average Shading Factor (AASF) dihitung untuk menilai efektivitas peneduh dalam mengurangi beban panas matahari, menggunakan pendekatan simulasi komparatif antara model dengan dan tanpa peneduh. Hasil studi ini mengonfirmasi bahwa desain peneduh eksternal baik horizontal, vertikal, atau kombinasi keduanya merupakan strategi pasif efektif untuk meningkatkan efisiensi energi bangunan pendidikan di iklim tropis perkotaan. Simulasi berbasis EDGE dapat digunakan sebagai alat pendukung keputusan dalam merancang selubung bangunan yang mendukung efisiensi energi pada bangunan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] C. Yang et al., “Impacts of Urbanization on Energy Consumption in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation Zone,” Sustainability 2024, Vol. 16, Page 8141, vol. 16, no. 18, p. 8141, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/SU16188141.

[2] D. Ariestadi, I. Alfianto, and M. Sulton, “Kriteria Kinerja Energi Untuk Kenyamanan Termal Pada Bangunan Fasilitas Pendidikan Tinggi Di Indonesia Analisis Dengan Metode Important Performance Analysis,” RUAS, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 31–41, Jul. 2014,doi:10.21776/ub.ruas.2014.012.01.4.

[3] N. Uddin, K. A. Mannan, S. G. Tarigan, P. Jaya, and T. Selatan, “IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science Iot-based measurement for observing thermal conductivity of modern office building Iot-based measurement for observing thermal conductivity of modern office building,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci, vol. 1268, p. 12009, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1268/1/012009.

[4] W. N. Putri and R. Purisari, “The Effectiveness of Building Envelope through OTTV Analysis (Case Study: Building B, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya),” International Conference on Social Design Proceeding, vol. 1, 2022, Accessed: Apr. 04, 2025. [Online]. Available:https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/ICSD/article/view/6427

[5] K. A. Mannan, S. G. Tarigan, and N. Uddin, “A Study of Shading Selection Strategy for Natural Ventilation of Office Buildings in Jakarta,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1218, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1218/1/012037.

[6] A. M. Nasution and Y. S. Rambe, “Pengaruh Desain Overhang Terhadap Efisiensi Energi Dan Kenyamanan Termal Pada Bangunan Seni Di Kota Medan,” Jurnal Arsitektur TERRACOTTA, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 237, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.26760/TERRACOTTA.V4I3.8783.

[7] A. Ibrahim, A. Freewan, and A. Obeidat, “An Evaluation Study of Shading Devices and Their Impact on the Aesthetic Perception vs. Their Energy Efficiency,” Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–59, 2023, doi: 10.47982/JFDE.2023.1.03.

[8] “Part 3-Energy Measures,” 2024.

[9] V. Nindita, P. Purwanto, J. Windarta, and Hadiyanto, “Comparative analysis of green building software for energy efficiency in campus settings,” Green Technologies and Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 100191, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.GRETS.2025.100191.

[10] M. Semua Tipe Bangunan, “Panduan Bagi Pengguna EDGE,” 2020.

[11] C. Kohler, Y. Shukla, and R. Rawal, “Calculating the effect of external shading on the solar heat gain coefficient of windows,” Building Simulation Conference Proceedings, vol. 5, pp. 2817–2823, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.26868/25222708.2017.769.

[12] “EDGE Methodology Report”.

[13] “Part 3-Energy Measures,” 2025.

[14] A. I. Jega and S. S. Muhy Al-Din, “Implication of Shading Passive Strategies in Buildings of Hot and Humid Climates for Energy Optimization: Lessons from Vernacular Dwellings in Nigeria,” Journal of Salutogenic Architecture, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 50–69, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.38027/JSALUTOGENIC_VOL2NO1_4.

[15] A. Heidari, M. Taghipour, and Z. Yarmahmoodi, “The Effect of Fixed External Shading Devices on Daylighting and Thermal Comfort in Residential Building,” Journal of Daylighting, Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp.165-180, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 165–180, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.15627/JD.2021.15.

[16] G. Kim, H. S. Lim, T. S. Lim, L. Schaefer, and J. T. Kim, “Comparative advantage of an exterior shading device in thermal performance for residential buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 46, pp. 105–111, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2011.10.040.

[17] A. Dutta, A. Samanta, and S. Neogi, “Influence of orientation and the impact of external window shading on building thermal performance in tropical climate,” Energy Build., vol. 139, pp. 680–689, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2017.01.018.

[18] A. A. Y. Freewan, “Impact of external shading devices on thermal and daylighting performance of offices in hot climate regions,” Solar Energy, vol. 102, pp. 14–30, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.SOLENER.2014.01.009.

[19] L. Li, M. Qu, and S. Peng, “Performance evaluation of building integrated solar thermal shading system: Building energy consumption and daylight provision,” Energy Build., vol. 113, pp. 189–201, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2015.12.040.

[20] H. Sghiouri, A. Mezrhab, M. Karkri, and H. Naji, “Shading devices optimization to enhance thermal comfort and energy performance of a residential building in Morocco,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 18, pp. 292–302, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2018.03.018.

[21] M. M. S. Ahmed, A. K. Abel-Rahman, A. H. H. Ali, and M. Suzuki, “Double Skin Façade: The State of Art on Building Energy Efficiency,” Journal of Clean Energy Technologies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 84–89, 2015, doi: 10.7763/JOCET.2016.V4.258.

[22] J. Litardo, R. Hidalgo-Leon, and G. Soriano, “Energy Performance and Benchmarking for University Classrooms in Hot and Humid Climates,” Energies 2021, Vol. 14, Page 7013, vol. 14, no. 21, p. 7013, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/EN14217013.

[23] W. Budiawan, I. K. C. P. Wiguna, K. D. Kurnia, H. Prastawa, T. Phommachak, and P. Andarani, “Assessing Thermal Comfort and Energy Efficiency in Partially Glazed Classroom Environments: Implications for Climate-Resilient Educational Spaces,” International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1527–1537, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.18280/IJSSE.140520.

[24] M. A. M. Shukri, J. Jailani, and A. Hauashdh, “Benchmarking the Energy Efficiency of Higher Educational Buildings: A Case Study Approach,” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 491–496, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.32479/IJEEP.11941.